SCENES FROM THE
WILDERNESS:
CHARTING NEW TERRITORY
Exodus 19:1-20:2 – Rev. Jerry Duggins
September 4, 2011
Touch….
When I read this text from Exodus, the cautionary comments around “touching”
strike me as especially noteworthy. God tells Moses to make sure the people
understand that neither they nor their animals are to touch the mountain. Those
who do touch the mountain are to be put to death by a means that does not
involve “touching.” Furthermore, Moses tells the people – well, the men, presumably - not to go near a woman.
It’s
as if God is afraid of too much intimacy or feels the need to preserve the
boundaries of personal space. On the day when God appears on the mountain to
talk with Moses, God even puts it in terms of a violation of personal space:
“warn the people not to break through to the Lord… or the Lord will break out
against them.” Were the terms not so serious, I’d think we were dealing with a
pair of siblings bickering in the back seat over who has more room. Or is it
the lover who holds back for fear of being hurt?
Touch.
Clearly God wants to draw near to the people. The text speaks of God’s desire
to make them a “treasured possession out of all the peoples.” God did go
through a lot of trouble to bring these people to this place. “I am the Lord
your God, who brought you out of the
So
at first glance, there appears to be a mixed message going on in this text when
we think about it in terms of touch. This seems especially true if we hear the
story through New Testament eyes. We think about Jesus touching and healing
lepers, rebuking the disciples when they prevent children from drawing near,
giving sight to the blind with a touch, opening the ears of the deaf with a
touch.
Today,
we speak of the ministry of touch.
Hospice
workers will remind family members how important touch may be for their loved
one even or especially after they pass into that unconscious state before
death. Most of us know the value of a hug after disappointment, the pleasure of
handholding whether we speak of lovers or parents and grandparents with a
child, the strong sense of belonging when lovers’ lips touch.
So
despite or because of God’s claim to regard these people as a treasured
possession, we are left confused by the threats uttered against those who would
draw too close. Is God attempting to set up an intimate relationship or break
it off?
Touch.
You may be familiar with the idea in the Hebrew Scriptures that to see God was
to risk death. It would seem that we have a similar notion going on here with
the sense of touch. I don’t imagine this sits too well with us. But let’s look
a little closer.
We
need to begin by returning to
It’s
a little outside our experience, but we need to imagine how a slave experiences
touch: the master’s whip, the sensitivity of sun-baked skin, the strain of
muscles stretched beyond their strength. Contrast this with the gentle touch of
a companion, the warm embrace of a daughter upon one’s return to the family.
The cruel touch of the master offset by the consoling touch of one who shares
in the suffering.
What
would their experience be of God’s touch, a God who had seemingly abandoned
them? And how would they have felt about God’s touch as the first of the
plagues struck Egypt, turning water into blood, followed by frogs and gnats,
flies and disease, boils and thunder and hail, locusts and darkness and then
the loss of the Egyptians’ first-born? Would such a demonstration of power, of
even greater mastery, induce a desire among the Hebrews to be embraced by God?
And
then God leads them out through Moses, leads them in the form of a pillar of
fire, demonstrating more power as they cross the Sea.
They
experience hunger and thirst only to be saved by still more awe-inspiring acts.
I don’t consider it a surprise that they wonder whether they’d be better off
back as slaves in
Embracing
God seems beyond the scope of possibilities. But suppose God ultimately desired
this kind of intimacy. How would God begin? How could God begin with a people
for whom the touch of a master was not a good thing? How does “don’t come too
close” sound to someone whose preference already is to remain at a safe
distance? Is it possible that God makes these rules as an acknowledgment and
validation of the feeling of these people? Is it possible that this text is not
so much about the holy otherness of God as it is a reflection of the new
relationship just begun, that God begins with where they are?
I
wonder whether there isn’t some good news here for people who don’t like to be
touched and for the times when all of us don’t want to be touched. Burn
victims, survivors of abuse, some experiences of paralyzing grief, new
relationships after a recent betrayal. There are times when we want only to
draw into ourselves, to be left alone, untouched. We shouldn’t always take
God’s silence as a lack of interest. Perhaps God is giving us space to begin
anew too.
Certainly
God challenges us and stretches us to become more faithful followers of Christ,
but always in a way that grasps our pain and is respectful of the distance we
require at the time.
As
we gather around this table, we are invited to draw near to God. Today, some of
us will want to feel God’s embrace through the sacrament. Such a thing is
possible. Others will only be able to receive the assurance that God does
understand how we feel. They may be in a place where intimacy seems less
desirable. If we have learned nothing else from our host, Jesus, we do know his
invitation to come as you are. Amen.